Film review: Is it really worth going to the cinema for Asteroid City?

Asteroid City" tries to present an epic sci-fi adventure in the vastness of space, but ultimately fails due to various aspects that do not fully realize the film's potential.

A central point of criticism concerns the plot. While the idea of a city on an asteroid is intriguing, the story remains superficial and cliche. There is a lack of innovative ideas or unexpected twists that could captivate the viewer. The characters remain flat and stereotyped without developing any deeper development or emotional connections with the audience. As a result, viewers only superficially share in the excitement.

Another weak point lies in the staging of the film. The visual effects often feel cheap and unrealistic, which detracts from the believability of the space scenes. The action scenes are sometimes staged spectacularly, but they lack coherent choreography and a clear spatial understanding. This takes away the suspense and thrill.

The acting performances in "Asteroid City" are average. Although the cast consists of talented actors, they are limited by the weak script and lack of character development. The dialogue is often stiff and cliche, further undermining the characters' credibility.

Another shortcoming concerns the thematic depth of the film. Although science fiction is often used as a genre to explore social or philosophical issues, "Asteroid City" lacks a deeper subtext. The storyline remains superficial, largely limited to superficial action and special effects, without offering meaningful messages or discussions about human nature.

Overall, "Asteroid City" feels like missed potential. The interesting premise is underused to tell a compelling story. The weak plot, visual flaws and superficial characters ultimately make the film feel like your average sci-fi deep space adventure.

Rating: